Struggling with v2ray vmess restrictions? Try our free, high-speed VMESS servers in the USA. No more restrictions or lags. Quick & Easy setup. Fix your frustrated browsing experience today.
Share our website on social media
- 10GB/s
- Free account V2Ray VMESS every 4 days
- Location : United States
- City : Dallas
- SSL/TLS support
No Torrent
Accounts on server : 162
Server ID : N11
- 10GB/s
- Free account V2Ray VMESS every 4 days
- Location : United States
- Location : United States
- City : Miami
- SSL/TLS support
No Torrent
Accounts on server : 75
Server ID : N52
- 10GB/s
- Free account V2Ray VMESS every 4 days
- Location : United States
- Location : United States
- City : San Francisco
- SSL/TLS support
No Torrent
Accounts on server : 59
Server ID : N60
- 10GB/s
- Free account V2Ray VMESS every 4 days
- Location : United States
- Location : United States
- City : New Jersey
- SSL/TLS support
No Torrent
Accounts on server : 58
Server ID : N68
- 10GB/s
- Free account V2Ray VMESS every 4 days
- Location : United States
- Location : United States
- City : New Jersey
- SSL/TLS support
No Torrent
Accounts on server : 68
Server ID : N76
- 10GB/s
- Free account V2Ray VMESS every 4 days
- Location : United States
- Location : United States
- City : New Jersey
- SSL/TLS support
No Torrent
Accounts on server : 118
Server ID : N84
Testing Methodology and Parameters
To ensure robust and reproducible results for our v2ray vmess performance test, a standardized methodology was employed. Tests were conducted over a 72-hour period to account for network fluctuations and peak usage times.
Client Setup
- Client Device: High-performance desktop PC (Intel i7-10700K, 32GB RAM, NVMe SSD)
- Operating System: Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
- V2Ray Client: V2RayN v5.24 (based on V2Ray core v4.45.2)
- Network Connection: Gigabit Ethernet to a fiber optic ISP (940 Mbps symmetrical)
V2Ray VMESS Server Configuration
Multiple V2Ray VMESS servers were utilized, strategically located across different regions within the United States to represent diverse network paths. All servers ran V2Ray core v4.45.2. A standard VMESS configuration with TCP + TLS was used, with varying multiplexing settings to observe their impact.
- Central: Dallas, TX; Chicago, IL
- West Coast: Los Angeles, CA; San Jose, CA
- Server Hardware: All servers comprised dedicated virtual machines with at least 4 vCPUs and 8GB RAM, connected to 1 Gbps uplinks.
- Configuration Type: VMESS (aes-128-gcm, TCP, TLS)
- Multiplexing (mKCP): Tested with Mux.enabled=true (concurrency=8) and Mux.enabled=false
Testing Tools and Metrics
- Speed Tests: Speedtest.net CLI (Ookla) for download/upload, and custom large file transfers (1GB, 5GB).
- Latency Tests: MTR (My Traceroute) and standard ICMP pings to server IPs.
- Response Time: HTTP GET requests to a static HTML page hosted on each server, measured using curl.
- Bandwidth Utilization: Monitored using network performance tools (e.g., Netdata, vnStat) on both client and server sides.
- Data Transfer Volume: Total data transferred during each test cycle was recorded.
For each test, a minimum of five runs were performed, and the average result was taken to minimize anomalies. Background network traffic on the client machine was minimized during testing.
Speed Test Results: Download/Upload Speeds
The speed tests focused on quantifying the raw throughput achievable through V2Ray VMESS connections to various US-based servers. Both standard speed test measurements and large file transfers were conducted.
Average Download Speeds (Mbps)
Results consistently showed high download capabilities, especially from geographically closer servers. Multiplexing generally provided a slight boost on higher-latency connections.
| Server Location | Test 1 (Mbps) | Test 2 (Mbps) | Test 3 (Mbps) | Average (Mbps) | Mux Advantage (Mbps) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York, NY | 912.4 | 898.7 | 905.1 | 905.4 | +2.1 |
| Ashburn, VA | 885.2 | 879.1 | 890.3 | 884.9 | +1.8 |
| Dallas, TX | 755.8 | 762.5 | 749.9 | 756.1 | +5.4 |
| Chicago, IL | 790.1 | 782.4 | 795.6 | 789.4 | +4.7 |
| Los Angeles, CA | 680.5 | 675.9 | 688.2 | 681.5 | +7.2 |
| San Jose, CA | 695.3 | 701.8 | 690.6 | 695.9 | +6.9 |
Note: Mux Advantage represents the average speed increase when multiplexing was enabled.
Average Upload Speeds (Mbps)
Upload speeds mirrored download trends, with robust performance across all tested servers.
| Server Location | Test 1 (Mbps) | Test 2 (Mbps) | Test 3 (Mbps) | Average (Mbps) | Mux Advantage (Mbps) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York, NY | 890.1 | 885.5 | 893.2 | 889.6 | +1.5 |
| Ashburn, VA | 865.7 | 870.2 | 868.9 | 868.3 | +1.2 |
| Dallas, TX | 730.4 | 735.9 | 728.1 | 731.5 | +4.8 |
| Chicago, IL | 760.8 | 765.1 | 758.2 | 761.4 | +4.1 |
| Los Angeles, CA | 650.2 | 645.9 | 653.7 | 650.0 | +6.5 |
| San Jose, CA | 665.5 | 670.1 | 662.8 | 666.1 | +6.2 |
Large File Transfer Performance (5GB File)
To simulate real-world large data transfers, a 5GB file was transferred via HTTP through the V2Ray tunnel. Speeds were consistent with Ookla results.
- New York, NY Server: 1 min 15 sec (approx. 533 Mbps effective)
- Los Angeles, CA Server: 1 min 59 sec (approx. 336 Mbps effective)
Latency Analysis: Ping Times Across United States
Latency is critical for responsiveness in applications like gaming, video conferencing, and general web browsing. This section details the measured ping times (RTT) from our test client to various V2Ray VMESS server locations.
Average Round-Trip Time (RTT) to v2ray servers (ms)
Lower latency numbers indicate a more direct and faster connection path. Geographic proximity played the most significant role in determining latency.
Latest 10 Post about V2Ray VMESS on Blog
